Interview With Condoleezza Rice[read online for free] by Condoleezza Rice, CNN Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, September 8, 2002.
We do know that [Saddam Hussein] is actively pursuing a nuclear
weapon. We do know that there have been shipments going into [Iraq], for
instance, of aluminum tubes that really are only suited to—high-quality
aluminum tools that are only really suited for nuclear weapons programs,
We know that he has the infrastructure, nuclear scientists to
make a nuclear weapon. And we know that when the inspectors assessed this
after the Gulf War, he was far, far closer to a crude nuclear device than
anybody thought, maybe six months from a crude nuclear device.
The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty
about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don’t what the
smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.
Threats and Responses: Intelligence; Rumsfeld Says U.S.
online for free] by Eric Schmitt, New York Times, September 28,
Bulletproof Evidence of Iraq’s Links to Al Qaeda
President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat [read/watch
online for free] by George W. Bush, Office of the Press Secretary, October
We’ve experienced the horror of September the 11th. We
have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into
buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing, in
fact, they would be eager, to use biological or chemical, or a nuclear weapon.
Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against
us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final
proof—the smoking gun—that could come in the form of a mushroom
Address to the United Nations Security Council [read/watch
online for free] by Colin Powell, February 5, 2003.
There can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological
weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more. And he has the
ability to dispense these lethal poisons and diseases in ways that can cause
massive death and destruction.
President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press
online for free] by George W. Bush, Office of the Press Secretary, March
I believe Saddam Hussein is a threat to the American people. I
believe he’s a threat to the neighborhood in which he lives. And
I’ve got a good evidence to believe that. He has weapons of mass
destruction, and he has used weapons of mass destruction, in his neighborhood
and on his own people. He’s invaded countries in his neighborhood. He
tortures his own people. He’s a murderer. He has trained and financed al
Qaeda-type organizations before, al Qaeda and other terrorist
Director of Central Intelligence Special Advisor Report on Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction[read online for free] (key findings, which the below quotes are from) by the Central Intelligence Agency, September 30, 2004.
Saddam Husayn ended the nuclear program in 1991 following the
Gulf war. ISG [Iraq Survey Group] found no evidence to suggest concerted
efforts to restart the program.
…ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its
undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible
indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions
ISG found no direct evidence that Iraq, after 1996, had plans
for a new BW [biological warfare] program or was conducting BW-specific work
for military purposes.
Lacking Biolabs, Trailers Carried Case for War [read
online for free] by Joby Warrick, Washington Post, April 12, 2006.
A secret fact-finding mission to Iraq—not made public
until now—had already concluded that the trailers had nothing to do with
Now, look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was—the
main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of
mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t…
[What did Iraq have to do with the attack on the World Trade
Skunks, Bogies, Silent Hounds, and the Flying Fish: The Gulf of Tonkin Mystery, 2-4 August 1964[read online for free] (you may need to download the document first to read it [try the right mouse button and save link as]) by Robert J. Hanyok, The National Security Agency’s Cryptologic Quarterly, 2000.
(S//SI) In maintaining the official
version of the attack, the NSA made use of surprisingly few published SIGINT
reports—fifteen in all. The research behind the new version which
follows is based on the discovery of an enormous amount of never-before-used
SIGINT material. This included 122 relevant SIGINT products, along with watch
center notes, oral history interviews, and messages among the various SIGINT
and military command centers involved in the Gulf of Tonkin incidents.
Naturally, this flood of new information changed dramatically the story of
that night of 4/5 August. The most important element is that it is now known
what the North Vietnamese Navy was doing that night. And with this information
a nearly complete story finally can be told.
(S//SI) Two startling findings emerged from the new
research. First, it is not simply that there is a different story as to what
happened; it is that no attack happened that night.
Report Reveals Vietnam War Hoaxes, Faked Attacks [read
online for free] by Agence France-Presse, Jan 7, 2008.
Excerpt: “But he said that probably the ‘most historically significant feature’ of the declassified report was the retelling of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.
“That was a reported North Vietnamese attack on American destroyers that helped lead to president Lyndon Johnson’s sharp escalation of American forces in Vietnam.
“The author of the report ‘demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress, that the evidence of an attack was ‘unimpeachable,’ but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that ‘no attack happened that night,’’ FAS said in a statement.
What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows
that there was no attack. It’s a dramatic reversal of the historical
record, Aftergood said.
NSA: [read/watch online
for free] by Democracy Now, January 10, 2008.
No Attack Happened in Gulf of Tonkin
Newly declassified documents have provided more evidence the
Johnson administration faked the Gulf of Tonkin incident to escalate the
Vietnam War. The alleged 1964 attack on U.S. warships by North Vietnamese was
used as a pretext to increase bombing and troop deployments in Vietnam. But a
report from the National Security Agency concludes
no attack happened that
Excerpt: “In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the
possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban
refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even
orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
Note: The following declassified top-secret documents on Operation Northwoods are displayed directly from the National Archives.
Twin Towers Engineered To Withstand Jet Collision[read online for free] by Eric Nalder, Seattle Times, February 27, 1993.
Modern Marvels: World Trade Center [watch
online for free] by Nancy Oey and Bob Petrella, History Channel, 2001.
Excerpt, from Frank A. DeMartini, on-site construction manager of the World
The [WTC] building was designed to have a fully loaded 707
crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the
building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this
structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense
grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting.
It really does nothing to the screen netting.
Book: City in the Sky: The Rise and Fall of the World Trade Center [read excerpts online for free] by James Glanz and Eric Lipton, Times Books in New York, 2003.
Excerpt, from a structural analysis of the WTC by the firm Worthington,
Skilling, Helle & Jackson:
The buildings have been investigated and found
to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing
707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such
collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or
substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety
of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
Twin Towers’ Designers Anticipated Jet Impacts Like
September 11th’s [read online for
free] by 9-11 Research, February 14, 2010.
Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7[read online for free] by National Institute of Standards and Technology, November 20, 2008.
Excerpt, from page 45 (page 87 of PDF):
In Stage 2, the north face
descended at gravitational acceleration… This free fall drop continued
for approximately 8 stories or 32.0 m (105 ft), the distance traveled between
times t=1.75 s and t=4.0 s.
Book: The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False [read excerpts online for free] by David Ray Griffin, Olive Branch Press in Ithaca, New York, 2009.
WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial [watch online for free]
by David Chandler, February 12, 2010.
Compiled Footage of Building 7’s Collapse
[watch online for
free] by BuildingWhat.org, 2010.
Lecture: [watch online for free] by Richard Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, May 11, 2008.
Book: The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé [read 2004 version online for free] by David Ray Griffin, Olive Branch Press in Ithaca, New York, 2008.
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon [read
online for free] by Dan Eggen, Washington Post, August 2, 2006.
We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American
Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, said Thomas H. Kean, the
former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission.
It was just
so far from the truth.
Explosives in World Trade Center[watch online for free] by Niels H. Harrit, TV 2 News, April 6, 2009.
International researchers have found traces of explosives among
the World Trade Center rubble. A new scientific article concludes that impacts
from the two hijacked aircraft did not cause the collapses in 2001. We turn
our attention to 9/11—the major attack in New York. Apparently the two
airplane-impacts did not cause the towers to collapse, according to a newly
published scientific article. Researchers found nano-thermite explosive in the
rubble, that cannot have come from the planes.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the
9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe [read
online for free] (click
Download PDF link) by Niels H. Harrit et
al., Bentham Open, February 13, 2009.
Excerpt: “A report on an April 2001 conference discloses who was known to be working on such explosives at that time:
The 221st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society held during April 2001 in San Diego featured a symposium on Defense Applications of Nanomaterials. … At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives… nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management.
…we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we
have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material,
incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or
Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century[read online for free] by Donald Kagan et al., Project for the New American Century, September, 2000.
The effects of the RMA [revolution in military affairs] will
have profound implications for how wars are fought, what weapons dominate, and
which nations enjoy military preeminence.
Excerpt, from page 51 (page 63 of PDF): “A transformation strategy that solely pursued capabilities for projecting force from the United States, for example, and sacrificed forward basing and presence, would be at odds with larger American policy goals and would trouble American allies.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event—like a new Pearl Harbor.
Note: Some of the individuals associated with the
Project for the
New American Century can be found on their website: for example, at the
bottom of the webpage http://www.
Documentary: [watch online for free] by Tad Lumpkin and Harold Uhl, Provocateur Network, 2011.
Documentary: [watch online for free] by Bill Still and Patrick Carmack, 1996.
Book: Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free [read excerpts online for free] (you may need to download the file first to read it) by Ellen Hodgson Brown, Third Millennium Press in Chippenham, 2008.
Book: No More National Debt by Bill Still, Reinhardt & Still in Winchester, Virginia, 2011.
The Secret Government: The Constitution in
online for free] by Bill Moyers, Alvin H. Parlmutter and Public
Affairs Television, 1987.
Supreme Court Upholds U.S. Policy of Secret Arrests &
online for free] by Democracy Now, January 13, 2004.
Book: Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World [read online for free] by L. Fletcher Prouty, Ballantine Books in New York, 1991.
Book: The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI’s Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States [read excerpts online for free] by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall, South End Press in Cambridge, 2001.
Top Secret America [read
A Hidden World, Growing Beyond Control; part
National Security Inc.; part
The Secrets Next Door; and part
Monitoring America, online for free] by Dana Priest and William
M. Arkin, Washington Post, December 20, 2010.
Exposing Bush’s Historic Abuse of Power [read
online for free] by Tim Shorrock, Salon, July 23, 2008.
With Release of [read/watch
online for free] by Democracy Now, June 27, 2007.
Family Jewels, CIA Acknowledges
Years of Assassination Plots, Coerced Drug Tests and Domestic Spying
Is the Pentagon Spying on Americans?: Secret Database
Obtained by NBC News Tracks [read online for free] by Lisa
Myers et al., NBC News, December 14, 2005.
Suspicious Domestic Groups
Book: The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How The War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals by [read excerpts online for free] Jane Mayer, Doubleday in New York, 2008.
X-Rated Screenings[watch online for free] by Pam Zekman, CBS 2, July 23, 2008.
New Scanners Break Child Porn Laws [read
online for free] by Alan Travis, Guardian, January 4, 2010.
Young Boy Strip Searched by TSA [watch online for free]
by Luke Tait, November 19, 2010.
Woman Wins Lawsuit Against TSA for Exposing Her Breasts
in Airport Patdown [read
online for free] by Daily Mail, January 13, 2011.
TSA Pat-Down Leaves Traveler Covered in Urine [read online for
free] by Harriet Baskas, NBC News, March 25, 2011.
[A] secret contingency plan…called for suspension of the
Constitution, turning control of the United States over to FEMA, appointment
of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of
martial law during a national crisis.
House to House [watch online for free]
by Bob Woodruff, ABC News, September 8, 2005.
The police and national guard going street by street, house to
house [in New Orleans]. … Sometimes entering open houses with guns
drawn, and instructions to disarm anyone inside.
Brigade Homeland Tours Start Oct. 1 [read
online for free] by Gina Cavallaro, Army Times, September 30,
[T]he 1st BCT [Brigade Combat Team] will be under the
day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern
Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade
emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.
They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd
Pentagon to Detail Troops to Bolster Domestic
online for free] by Spencer S. Hsu and Ann Scott Tyson, Washington
Post, December 1, 2008.
The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops
inside the United States by 2011…
License to Kill? Intelligence Chief Says U.S. Can Take
Out American Terrorists [read
online for free] by Jason Ryan, ABC News, February 3, 2010.
The director of national intelligence affirmed rather bluntly
today that the U.S. intelligence community has authority to target American
citizens for assassination if they present a direct terrorist threat to the
Book: Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media [read excerpts online for free] [watch corresponding documentary online for free] by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Pantheon Books in New York, 2002.
Book: Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling [read previous book online for free] by John Taylor Gatto, New Society Publishers in Gabriola Island, 2010.
Book: The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America: A Chronological Paper Trail [free online version] by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, Conscience Press in Ravenna, 1999.